Why the red herring, then?
Win16 implies Windows 3.11 and older versions of Windows. Windows 3.x has not been sold or distributed since (probably) 1996-97. Perhaps up until 2000 or so Win16 could have been positioned as fallback and legacy compatibility for the oldest systems around. I recall supporting Win16 code for one product based client up until 1999 or so, but after than they cut their ties with the platform.
But not since then.
It just makes me suspect the quality of the management oversight, just a little.
Or perhaps extra points will go to candidates who say "that's dumb/crazy, why?"