Author Topic: An Interesting New Development on the 9-11 WTC Collapse  (Read 121 times)

ArnoldW2

  • Trusted Member
  • Guru
  • ******
  • Posts: 457
    • View Profile
An Interesting New Development on the 9-11 WTC Collapse
« on: October 04, 2017, 05:50:32 PM »
Alaska University: Impossible That WTC Building 7 Collapsed By Small Fires As Claimed By NIST

The University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) was tasked with investigating how World Trade Center building 7      (WTC-7) fell on 9/11. The team found that WTC-7 did not fall due to fire, contradicting the NIST who said the building collapsed from structural damages due to the fire.

This article includes a video.

While the UAF team disqualified fire as a cause of collapse, they don’t yet know the real cause of the collapse, because their analysis is not finished yet.

50 seconds into the video, the speaker thanks the funders of the UAL study.  Listen to who funded it.

The speaker talks about the NIST analysis of the WTC-7 collapse, and two structure modeling mistakes the NIST made, until about 39 minutes into the video.  This part of the video is highly technical -- by an Engineer for Engineers.  Lay people won't understand it.

At about 52 minutes, the speaker shows a list of 7 structural possibilities considered by the UAF the team.  The NIST considered only two possibilities.

At about 57 minutes, there is an interesting Question and Answer session.

Comment by ArnoldW2:
At 22 + 1/2 minutes into the video, the speaker presents a video showing the collapse of WTC-7.  Although the collapses of WTC-1 and WTC-2 (the two tallest skyscrapers) did NOT resemble a controlled demolition, the collapse of WTC-7 most certainly did.  Important caveat:  Only the upper half of WTC-7 is visible in the video of its collapse. Without seeing the bottom half of the collapse, it is impossible to be certain that the collapse was controlled.

https://www.activistpost.com/2017/09/alaska-university-impossible-that-wtc-building-7-collapsed-by-small-fires-as-claimed-by-nist.html

The Gorn

  • I absolutely DESPISE improvised sulfur-charcoal-salt peter cannons made out of hollow tree branches filled with diamonds as projectiles.
  • Trusted Member
  • Wise Sage
  • ******
  • Posts: 21652
  • Gorn Classic, user of Gornix
    • View Profile
Re: An Interesting New Development on the 9-11 WTC Collapse
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2017, 05:56:42 PM »
How soon before the CIA deals with this horrid disclosure of classified intel?

Ever since 9/11 part of the recurring folklore of the day's airliner attacks has been the assertion that the owner of tower 7 allegedly told someone to "pull" the building - "pull" apparently being a common term in the building demolition business to indicate to set off the explosive charges.

Personally I will always think that the buildings actually impacted fell far too quickly and neatly to be caused by an uncontrolled fire.
Gornix is protected by the GPL. *

* Gorn Public License. Duplication by inferior sentient species prohibited.

unix

  • Trusted Member
  • Wise Sage
  • ******
  • Posts: 3352
    • View Profile
Re: An Interesting New Development on the 9-11 WTC Collapse
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2017, 08:28:39 AM »
I've always thought that WTC 7 was the strangest case of them all.
Brawndo. It's got what plants crave.