I've been mulling over our recent discussion, and I realize that I have an ambivalent attitude towards "control". I have a generally negative attitude towards managers that I would call "control freaks", and who engage in micromanagement, and extreme status games: "Make coffee for me or your fired".
Some of the worst offenders are not clueless PHBs, but rather former techies who earned their stripes by brilliant analysis of aberrant systems, whether hardware systems, or software systems or business systems, and who brought them under control using sheer will power and intellectual strength. They get promoted into management, and the result is a disaster.
That's one of the reasons I opted out of the management track for myself.
At the same time, the people who want to organize a software project like a counterculture movement make me look for the exit. You know the kind, "let's all sit down and sing Kumbaya until we are comfortable with each other and suddenly all the hard decisions will become easy ones." Man, I'd rather deal with a top-down IBM style hierarchy. (That's your fathers' IBM for you young 'uns).
But when you talk about gaining more control over your own life, that's a completely different topic. It's not "control" like management cotntrol. And it's not "control" like engineering control. If I get into life control topics, I'm going to start saying stupid things again. I don't need to do that.